The social contract & discourses

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Translated by George Douglas Howard Cole Note: Images of the original pages are available through the the Google Books Library Project. See http://www.google.com/books?id=exNPAAAAMAAJ THE SOCIAL CONTRACT & DISCOURSES BY JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU LONDON & TORONTO PUBLISHED BY J. M. DENT & SONS IN NEW YORK BY E. P. DUTTON & CO 1920 EVERYMAN'S LIBRARY EDITED BY ERNEST RHYS PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY ROUSSEAU'S SOCIAL CONTRACT, ETC. TRANSLATED WITH INTRODUCTION BY G. D. H. COLE, FELLOW OF MAGDALEN COLLEGE, OXFORD Contents INTRODUCTION For the study of the great writers and thinkers of the past, historical imagination is the first necessity. Without mentally referring to the environment in which they lived, we cannot hope to penetrate below the inessential and temporary to the absolute and permanent value of their thought. Theory, no less than action, is subject to these necessities; the form in which men cast their speculations, no less than the ways in which they behave, are the result of the habits of thought and action which they find around them. Great men make, indeed, individual contributions to the knowledge of their times; but they can never transcend the age in which they live. The questions they try to answer will always be those their contemporaries are asking; their statement of fundamental problems will always be relative to the traditional statements that have been handed down to them. When they are stating what is most startlingly new, they will be most likely to put it in an old-fashioned form, and to use the inadequate ideas and formulae of tradition to express the deeper truths towards which they are feeling their way. They will be most the children of their age, when they are rising most above it. Rousseau has suffered as much as any one from critics without a sense of history. He has been cried up and cried down by democrats and oppressors with an equal lack of understanding and imagination. His name, a hundred and fifty years after the publication of the Social Contract , is still a controversial watchword and a party cry. He is accepted as one of the greatest writers France has produced; but even now men are inclined, as political bias prompts them, to accept or reject his political doctrines as a whole, without sifting them or attempting to understand and discriminate. He is still revered or hated as the author who, above all…